|
RECOVERY
TIP OF THE MONTH
All the following 'Recovery Tips of
the Month' are copyrighted by Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting
Them Sober" books
|
| |
|
PLEASE BOOKMARK THIS PAGE AND KEEP COMING BACK
TO THE SITE!
(tell your friends too! Thanks)
www.GettingThemSober.com |
|
Click
on the year below to see that year's tips.
|
|
December,
2003, Recovery tip of the Month
by Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
Two issues in this "tip"....... separate, but related, I believe.
a.) If a recovering alcoholic tells the spouse that "she
shoulda done xxx" or that "she shoulda not done xxx"
for his recovery.....and/or "she's trying to make me feel guilty"--------------
What many of the "good oldtimers" in A.A. would
say to him, is this:
1. "you're lucky she's still there!"
2. "you know why you feel guilty? Because you're
guilty!" The A.A. Big Book, in the chapter about working Step
3, says very clearly that the MAIN problem of the alcoholic is selfishness
and self-centeredness. When I'm training counselors, I bring out a
blackboard and draw a bell-curve on it...... on one end of the curve,
is "the family disease"----characterized by "both the
spouse and the alcoholic blame the spouse". On the other end
of the curve, is the "recovery" of both the family and the
alcoholic------characterized by "the alcoholic centering on -----
cherishing ------- the spouse ----on a consistent basis.................
and the spouse being able to enjoy it, without reverting again to
giving, giving, giving." Both of them find it very difficult.......
the alcoholic finds it difficult to not revert to self-centeredness......and
the spouse finds it difficult to not revert to centering on him and
his needs....... But to consistently .........and continually.......
over many years....... make these 180-degree changes ----- is imperative
for the family to truly heal.
b.) What about this term "enabler"? I've dealt
with this in earlier "tips of the month"...... but want to
quote, here, a small excerpt from the book, "Getting Your Children
Sober" -----------
"When a family member rescues the alcoholic, and
I label her "an enabler", she obviously is still doing the
rescuing behaviors and is not yet unafraid enough to give them up. She
knows that I am being judgmental when I use this term. Even when I say
it lovingly, I seem to be admonishing her to go faster than she is capable
of doing at that time. And she feels despairing, because she IS doing
her best. She may get so discouraged and frustrated and overwhelmed
that she stops treatment.
"More specifically, the term "enabler"
implies that while the family member did not CAUSE the drinking, their
rescue operations CONTRIBUTED to the perpetuation of the drinking. Such
thinking is dangerous; it leads alcoholics, who are ALREADY looking
for a way to blame others for the drinking, into again placing responsibility
for the drinking on the family.
"Alcoholics do not need any encouragement to blame
others! Alcoholism counselors spend much of their time trying to crack
through the blame-systems of alcoholics. It is considered to be a major
breakthrough in the wellness process of alcoholics when they begin to
acknowledge that NOTHING "got them drunk". In contrast, alcoholics
who have had relapses and are re-entering treatment are now often heard
saying, "I wouldn't have gone out that time if I hadn't been enabled!"
(p.s....... instead of calling families "enablers",
try saying "rescuers"------the connotation is much kinder.......
the family member will stay around and not run away in shame if "called
a rescuer"...... We did not enable the disease----we rescued the
ones we loved..........And the rescuing stops when the family member
is gently taught about alcoholism and how it works......and how to stop
fearing the alcoholic's behavior....... when we lose our fears of "losing
them"------we can so much more easily stop the rescuing.) IMPORTANT-------
Of course, only do or not do anything that this site ----or any site
on the internet----- talks about, if it is safe for you and your children.
November,
2003, Recovery Tip of the Month
from
Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO PRINT OUT AND MAKE
COPIES OF THESE TIPS (AND ALL THE ARTICLES ON THIS WEBSITE) ----- AS
LONG AS THEY ARE NOT ALTERED OR USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES., AND YOU
CREDIT THIS WEBSITE SO THAT PEOPLE WHO READ THE TIPS CAN COME HERE AND
GET HELP.
When a recovering-in-A.A. alcoholic has relapses in the
first few weeks/months of his/her journey of recovery, I don't believe
those are 'relapses' per se..... the person has just not yet gotten
sober.
But when a person in A.A. has years of sobriety, and
drinks again -- here are some thoughts on this.......
a. 99% of people who drink again after years of sobriety
have stopped going to A.A. meetings ---- or cut down greatly on those
meetings til they were almost non-existent
b. the others almost always have come bumping up against issues that
they think they cannot deal with, or cannot stand.
Some of those issues are ------
1. never having really thoroughly laid to rest the need for the hyper-excited
atmosphere that goes along with much alcoholic drinking
2. sexual or gambling addiction issues
3. clinical depression or bipolar disorders 4. When coming back into
the rooms of A.A. after a relapse, most people think the real problem
is embarrassment//guilt//shame.....but I believe those are immediate
hurdles, but not the real problem.
The real issue is, has the person truly started to look
at the disease process in terms of the progression of alcoholism?
What are some of the facts that one needs to look at,
to prevent future relapses?
1. The oldtimers in A.A. say, "it takes three to
five years to get out of the woods"..... Basically it means that
the brain damage needs TIME to clear up. I've seen many an alcoholic
who, when coming into A.A., had difficulty articulating clear sentences.....their
speech patterns were disjointed.....and it usually takes about 7 years
for that to totally clear up.
Brain damage in alcoholism is very frightening......
once a person reaches a certain point of "wet brain", there
is no going back...... it is irretrievable brain damage and the back
wards of mental institutions have many hundreds of thousands of people
in them who drank to the point of no return.
And people who "go in and out" of A.A. often
tell themselves four things--
(a.) "I'll just go right back to the meetings if I drink again"
(b.) "time in A.A. doesn't matter"
(c.) "we only have today"
(d.) "I see some people with longterm sobriety that have lousy
sobriety, as far as I'm concerned..... I wouldn't want their idea of
sobriety"
What are they really saying to themselves and others?
What are they really believing about themselves and about this disease?
(a.) they are telling themselves -- "I don't believe the oldtimers
in A.A. who say, "you can know you have another "drunk"
in you..... but you can't know if you have another "recovery"
in you." (what does that mean? it means that one of those times
you "go back out drink", you may not have the choice, anymore,
to "come back in" to A.A...... you may have lost the choice
because of the disease process's working on the brain and central nervous
system.
(b.) they don't believe the facts of the disease of alcoholism......
one of the facts is that it takes un-interrupted sobriety time for the
brain and central nervous system to continue to recover.
(c.) with relapses occurring, the disease continues its progression.
(d.) When they tell themselves that "longterm sobriety is only
really good if it is "quality" sobriety"..... they are
unconsciously and subtly telling themselves that it's ok to drink again
if they don't have "quality sobriety" in the future.
What is the truth about that? ------ Everyone's life
goes up and down...... and everyone has times ----even long times -----that
they feel they handle badly. ------ Your ego, your guilt, your morals,
your ANYTHING, cannot be "neck and neck" with your sobriety........
because at least if you don't drink, you have a shot at straightening
your behavior out. If you drink, though, your behavior will automatically
get worse despite any good intentions you may have. And if you don't
drink, the chances are, you won't kill a child on the road while you're
driving. And if you don't drink, the chances are, you won't screw up
the judgment part of your brain and tell yourself that "you can
handle it when you drink and drive."
One more thing-- when someone says of an oldtimer in A.A.
who acts arrogant and nasty-- "oh, he's better off if he goes out
and drinks..... maybe he'll get humbled by it and act better when he
comes to meetings again."-- What do I think of that statement?
Well, again, who's to say he'll be able to get back in A.A.? And isn't
his behavior better (for the world and his family!) if he's sober rather
adding alcohol to the mix? ..... And again, very important-- he might
kill someone on the highway before he "comes back to A.A. and gets
humbled".
"October,
2003, recovery tip of the month"
from Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
In the September, 2003, "recovery tip", I talked about
the family member (whose spouse is in A.A.) who sometimes feels, "Why
do you STILL have to go to all those meetings?"
What's going on behind those words?
a.) The recovering alcoholic has a lot
of "alcoholic issues"------one of them is often feeling like "an egomaniac
with an inferiority complex". Now, how can that manifest when he/she
is interacting with his/her spouse? The alcoholic was (understandably!)
"always wrong" when still drinking....... and when newly-sober, can
often have a hurt ego from that memory...... never mind that it is true
that the drinking-alcoholic actions were awful-------- it doesn't feel
good when one is reminded of it.
SO------- to compensate for it, one often (unconsciously)
acts smug when one feels one is "one up" on one's spouse (for a change)........hence,
the attitude of "well, I go to A.A. and you're not in a recovery program
for the family------------ so I'm doing better than you!" "Maybe some
day you'll catch up with me spiritually!"
A lot of this one-ups-manship and hurt feelings can be
turned around and the marriage get a bit more healed if one can get
the courage to be open about feelings and let the mate know that you've
felt awful being "the wrong one" and will try to be a more "eyeball-to-eyeball"
------ i.e., egalitarian ----- mate. In Bill Wilson's book, "As Bill
sees it", (he was the co-founder of A.A.), he talks about the fact that
one of the most difficult things alcoholics need to do is to become
more eyeball-to-eyeball with everyone....... not better than........not
worse than, others.
b.) The spouse can get lonely and feels
hurt and left out when the newly-sober mate is obviously getting help
from others-------when the spouse has literally put YEARS into trying
to help........and probably got kicked in the teeth for it.
And now, after "sticking by her man", he's sober---------and
sharing his innermost stuff with others, not her.
It can sometimes help for the spouse to share just that
with her A.A. mate. It can help for the A.A. to try to put the shoe
on the other foot and try to feel what the spouse might feel.
(Of course, this can usually only work well if, once there
is sobriety, the "alcoholic games" have basically ended........ i.e.,
if both people feel rather raw and wary, but there is still a lot of
love and kindness remaining in the marriage.
If not, if the spouse is too open too soon, this info
can be "used" against her/him.)
c.) If the alcoholic has a pattern of
adultery // flirting with others ------ then the non-alcoholic spouse
can very understandably feel threatened when the alcoholic is "going
to so many meetings"-------when he/she often get "dressed up" to go
to the meetings-------- comes home late------ gets calls from women
in A.A.......whatever the patterns were -----and obviously still are.
Add to this, the often-used pattern of denial and crazymaking on top
of it-------- like, "what ARE you talking about?! This woman in A.A.
who calls me is HURTING, for goodness sake.....what's WRONG with you?!......
have you no compassion?!"
Sexual "games" are often more hurtful to the spouse than
the drinking was. There is a saying in A.A. about "don't work the 13th
Step." (There are 12 steps in A.A.)
What IS "13-stepping"?
Well, the 12th step in A.A. is "working with others"......carrying
the message to other alcoholics.
But the wise oldtimers in A.A. tell the newcomers that
"men sponsor men" and "women sponsor women"...... they know full-well
about A.A. "romances" -- especially when one or both of them is married.
Old patterns die hard....... especially when alcoholic
ego's are involved. "An alcoholic will fall madly in love with a parking
meter, if it pays attention to him".
"September, 2003, recovery tip of the month"
by Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
DON'T LET THE GIFTS OF SOBRIETY REPLACE THE GIFT OF SOBRIETY Ninety-nine
percent of the time, when people go back to drinking after going to
A.A. for a period of time, it is because they stopped going to meetings.
And of the the most common reasons for that stopping-going-to-meetings
is "I'm too busy now, getting on with my life!"
In the field of alcoholism, we call that "playing catch-up" -----
i.e., trying to "catch up" for all the years misspent on being out
of it------ trying to "make up to family"---- trying to "get ahead"
on the job/career track-----trying to prove to family and community
that "you're community-minded" by getting active in all sorts of local-politics
committees and neighborhood associations and church subcommittees.
What's wrong with that? Nothing!------- as long as you, in your heart
of hearts-------in your gut------ have internalized that none of that
matters if you don't stay sober.
What's that you say? "Oh, don't worry------- I won't drink.......
I DON'T EVEN WANT IT!...... all I want to do is make it up to my family
for all the years etc etc etc".
What the newly-sober person in A.A. often does not realize is how
true the AA Big Book is when it says that this disease is cunning,
powerful and baffling. It doesn't just tell you (many times) to go
back out and drink! It knows that you won't probably fall for that!
It says, instead, "hey you feel great! You don't need that many meetings!"
And it peters out...............slowly.......... gradually.........
so that the first six months or year, you've been going to a meeting
or two daily..........and now it's about 2 or 3 a week........and
you're secretly looking forward to just one a week........ and then
one every two or so weeks--------so it doesn't interfere with your
busy and growing schedule. And besides, your family was getting a
little unhappy with why you still "need all those meetings".
And your therapist has been questioning "your addiction to A.A."!
Neither of them understands when they say this-------they mean well-----but
they don't understand.
When I have a newly sober client, I have them read "Under the Influence"......
I have them go to the www.GettingThemSober.com website and read the
sections called "Is the alcoholic serious about sobriety?" and "what
happens when alcoholics stop going to A.A.?"
Alcoholism is not just a "little behavioral problem"........ it's
a serious, fatal, progressive disease that just waits and hopes that
the recovering alcoholic will forget the facts and "think he's well"
and "can drink normally". It's a very very patient disease.
"August, 2003, recovery tip of the month"
by Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
Popularly speaking, drugs fall into two categories----the uppers
and the downers. The downers are the sedative drugs, and they include
(but are not limited to) alcohol, sleeping pills, painkillers, tranquilizers,
benadryl, and marijuana.
When a person is already an alcoholic -- if that person starts taking
any of the other sedative drugs -- "cross addiction" (an automatic
addiction to whatever other sedative drugs one takes) usually begins.
1. What are the two results of this "cross
addiction"?
a.) the alcoholic is thrown into a later stage of
the alcoholism than he/she would have been, had "just" alcohol been
involved
b.) a synergistic ("multiplier") effect happens.
As an example----if an alcoholic has one "joint" of marijuana plus
one beer------the effect on his/her body/brain is NOT one-plus-one-------but
the effect is as if the person had TEN beers.
2. There are usually exceptions to this process-----
a.) during and immediately after surgery, a person
often needs to have sedative drugs for a very short time (when one
is careful about one's recovery, the usage is monitored and detox
can be necessary afterwards)
b.) some alcoholics also have serious life-threatening
disorders/diseases, and need to take sedative drugs in order to survive
(somehow, for many of them, God does hold them and take care of them
so that the alcoholism is not progressed because of it)
c.) when an an alcoholic is going through hospital
detox, in order to prevent the D.T.'s, librium is usually given for
a few days
July, 2003, Recovery Tip of the Month
by Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
What is one of the most important things the family can do to speed
up their recovery?
Really work on INTERNALIZING how very much the alcoholism colors everything
the alcoholic says, thinks, and does.
When we really begin to truly understand that it is the alcoholism
that is coming out of his mouth-----
a. we don't wonder so much why he does his junk
b. we don't need to ask so often, if he loves us..........because
we begin to really understand how toxic his brain really is..........
that the Executive Decision-Maker part of his brain is pickled and
incapable of being anything but the carry-outer of alcoholic decisions
and behavior about family, work, and all matters in life
c. we begin to understand the stages of alcoholism--------- we begin
to understand that in all but the late stages, there are periodic
times of "control" and seeming normalcy........ and we begin to understand
that these times, given the progression of this disease, do not last.........and
that these times grow less frequent and further apart as long as the
alcoholic drinks at all
d. We do not berate ourselves for forgetting all this--------- we
do not berate ourselves for forgetting how pervasive this disease
is in all aspects of the alcoholic's life.
Because part of this disease is that it continually tells not only
the alcoholic------but the family too-------that it is not as bad
as it is. This disease tells the family that ------
a. "this CAN'T be all about alcoholism"
b. "maybe the counselor we saw is right-------maybe he'd not drink
so much if I communicated more......or smiled more"
-------- Best to all in unravelling the crazymaking and not getting
diverted from the focus of REAL recovery from the family disease of
alcoholism, Toby
June, 2003, Recovery Tip of the Month
by Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
What about when we see couples getting divorced and there is no alcoholism?
We often think, "there's no drinking there" and wonder why in the
world they think they have problems.
When I receive calls for telephone counseling from such persons, and
take a family history, often it is revealed that there is indeed alcohol-ism------
maybe not active drinking------ but certainly the "ism" is there.
What's a "typical scenario"?
She is the adult child of a minister........ the minister is a teetotaler
and an adult child of an abusing alcoholic---- so she is the grandchild
of an alcoholic.
Her husband is an adult child of an alcoholic father.
Neither of them drinks.
Both of them have "inherited" the patterns of behavior in generational
alcoholic families and haven't a clue as to why they are having tremendous
difficulties with----
a. chronic low-level depression
b. burnout from a lifestyle of excessive caretaking
c. huge guilt about saying no to anything
d. much shame about presenting anything less than a perfect "front"
to the public about their family histories
How does this couple differ from other divorcing couples who do not
come from alcoholic families?
When there is no history of alcoholism or major mental illness in
those couples (and that is about half of American families)-----then
there are spiritual maladies of course------- and immaturity and selfishness
and shame ------ but these issues do not exist to the EXTENT that
they exist in alcoholic families.
We who "come from" alcohol-ism have huge dollops of --------
a. more shame/ simmering resentment/ touchiness
b. more irrational guilt about lessening any caretaking
c. more need to present the perfect "front" about who we are and where
we come from.
When I meet an over-working, over-achieving, 'perfect' person-------
I'm willing to lay odds on the fact that I've just met an adult child
of an alcoholic.
And when I meet a couple and the wife is frustrated because she feels
this bottomless pit about the need to connect--------and her husband
buries himself in work and cannot emotionally connect----------- and
he feels 'pushed' by her.......and she feels walls around him-----------
I'm willing to lay odds on the fact that they are both from alcoholic
families. WE FIND EACH OTHER------- WE HAVE ALCOHOLIC-FAMILY RADAR.....AND
WE MARRY EACH OTHER..... best to all in recovery, Toby
May, 2003, recovery tip of the month
by Toby Rice Drews, author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
One of the worst manifestations of the family disease of alcoholism
is the irrational guilt that families have when they are angry at the
alcoholic when he/she is acting out.
It goes like this------
a. the alcoholic "does it again"
b. the family member gets enraged (years of this junk of course produces
more than just annoyance)
c. when the anger dies down (and it usually will, after the alcoholic
acts nice again, for awhile), the family member starts to (at least,
unconsciously) feel bad for "being mean to the alcoholic" when he/she
acted out a short while ago (all remembrance of this happening so many,
many times before goes out the window-----the guilt sets in as if the
family member got so angry "just because the alcoholic was nasty for
awhile"........i.e., the family member makes "molehills out of mountains")
d. because of this minimizing the effects of chronic emotional (and
often, physical) abuse, the guilt of the family member increases
e. the family member tries to "make up for his/her anger" by rescuing
the alcoholic once again------ or by going out of her/his way to make
the alcoholic happy
f.The alcoholic sees us as crawling to him/her when we go out of our
way to make them like us....... and we feel demeaned by our begging
because we are so scared of losing them or losing their love that we
cannot stop ourselves from doing this--------------plus, then, the alcoholic
often gets contemptuous towards us for this behavior of ours-----even
though we are trying to make him feel good. He has no compassion for
us, and we often
forget to have compassion for ourselves.
g. the family member sees the contempt and gets angry all over again
("after all I've done for you" and you junk on me again!)
h. the irrational guilt sets in all over again
THINGS TO REMEMBER TO HELP LESSEN THE IRRATIONAL GUILT ----
1. as Father Martin said in an early pamphlet of his ----- "the family
often feels guilt for being angry at the alcoholic...... if there is
any "sin", it is for babying the alcoholic, not for any anger toward
the alcoholic"
2. Here are a few short excerpts on this subject from the book, "Getting
Them Sober, volume 2"----- "....... often, when things are awful, your
expectation of yourself is that you be able to get out of the marriage,
immediately get well from all that you've been through, find somebody
who is terrific, and live happily ever after....... all within a few
months.
"But there are ways to emotionally detach from painful situations that
one cannot, yet, physically leave (if you want to leave, that is), and
one of these is to see your situation as a "training ground" to get
well and out from under the abuse.
"You will grow to see that you are making the alcoholic the alcoholic
too important------and making yourself too un-important!
"Actually, what you have internalized (and what the alcoholic has you
convinced of) is that you are so weak around him------------- but alcoholics
don't marry weak people! You're NOT as dependent on the situation as
you think you are!
"That's just one of the illusions of alcoholism."
April, 2003, "recovery tip of the month" from Toby Rice Drews, author,
the "Getting Them Sober" books
There have been many books and "programs" over the decades since A.A.
was started, that have tried to say, in various fashions, that "A.A.
doesn't work" or that "A.A. is not for everyone" or that instead of
alcoholism being a disease, it is a "behavior that can be just dropped".
I certainly would love it if people just outgrew their alcoholism rather
than it being a fatal and progressive disease, that left untreated,
leads to death or insanity.
(On this note, please read the best scientific book on this subject,
"Under the Influence", by James Milam).
But about these issues-----
a.) A.A. is over three million strong in the U.S...... it is always
amazing to most of us who work in the field of alcoholism when we hear
people claim that A.A. doesn't work for people who try it!
It is true that only 2 out of 34 alcoholics ever reach the rooms of
A.A. -----but once they do, the recovery rate is 75%.
Half the persons who get to A.A. stay sober from day one, and another
25% eventually get and stay sober after relapses, if they keep coming
back to the rooms of recovery.
It would be wonderful if it were true that many more people than that
actually get and stay sober by themselves or through other means!
The problem with much of getting sober through other means is that alcoholism
is a very patient disease....... and it is progressive.
As I've discussed in much more detail in an earlier "recovery tip of
the month", getting sober through a fundamentalist church often doesn't
work because after getting dry, and being saved, most fundamentalist
churches then tell the alcoholic that he or she is no longer alcoholic.......
and when an alcoholic hears that, he usually does not hear "and therefore
you no longer have to drink again"...... he hears, instead, in his heart
of hearts, that he is able to drink "normally" again.... which usually
leads to his or her doing just that----- drinking again.
Of course, that "normal" drinking is no longer possible.
Once an alcoholic, the body cannot process alcohol the same way as "normal"
people, and then the alcoholic is off and running ----- at the same
stage of the disease as when he stopped drinking.
Most of us in the field of alcoholism, including myself, personally
have known scores of people that have unfortunately tried this course
and have died tragically and unnecessarily.
b.) What about people who "just stop"? Ask any alcoholic ----- he'll
tell you he can stop anytime! The problem is, as most recovering alcoholics
say, they can "stop anytime-----the problem is staying stopped!"
Why is it so difficult to "stay stopped"? The problem is the protracted
withdrawal syndrome....... at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,
18 months, 24 months, and 36 months, there occurs what is called "withdrawal".....
these withdrawal times cause biochemical cravings in alcoholics to drink
again..... And it is often subtle----- the cravings often don't appear
as blatant "let's drink" messages to the brain. They most often appear
as depression, rages, terrible fears, etc....... and the alcoholic,
after years and years of drinking, reverts to his/her usual method of
wanting relief....... drinking. At these times, the oldtimers in A.A.
tell the new people to go to lots of meetings during those times, and
"it will pass"..... and it does.
When I get calls for counseling and the spouse tells me that her husband
"went back to drinking" after being sober for quite a while, I ask her
if it was during any of those time periods....... and invariably, the
answer is yes. And invariably, she tells me that he was not in A.A.,
but "did it on his own"...... and that the family all thought that he
was "doing fine", and cannot understand "what happened". What happened
was the protracted withdrawal syndrome.
The Lancet-- the journal of the British Medical Society-- reported that
a very extensive study was done with hundreds of volunteers who were
all recovering alcoholics who were each sober 2-1/2 years. They extracted
spinal fluid from each of them, and in all of them, they found remaining
cells of alcohol.
Is this withdrawal merely a state of mind?
In the central nervous system of the alcoholic, when withdrawal occurs,
the cells actually change shape ----- from their normal circular shape,
they become box-like in shape, with the four corners looking like they
have tentacles reaching out.
c.) Why do people need to keep going to recovery meetings when they
have years of sobriety?
Two reasons -----
1. to help others who are new...... we have a short time on earth and
we are here to be of service and help others..... not to just "get ours".
2.) to be constantly reminded that they have this disease. Why? Because
this disease constantly tries to tell the alcoholic that he does not
have this disease. And if he is "out there" by himself, he will probably
eventually listen to it, and drink again-------thinking he is "five
years sober and therefore doesn't have a problem with drinking anymore!"
OF COURSE alcoholics report that they "can get sober anytime by themselves!"
OF COURSE alcoholics who drink again tell people that they aren't "really
drinking!"
There seems to be a "magic time" of at least five years without drinking
-- and doing it without getting any help -- that is a benchmark for
alcoholics to drink again.
When they reach that five-year mark, oftentimes, they really start to
believe that they have "beat it" and that they can "drink normally"
again, without getting drunk. And many of them do just that for awhile,
but then, the progression of the disease takes over.
d.) What about alcoholism being a "fatal disease" that leads to insanity
or death? According to the National Institute on Mental Health, dementia
is roughly divided into three parts---------dementia from alzheimers,
dementia from what is commonly called "senility"-- and dementia from
alcoholism, which accounts for far greater numbers than from alzheimers.
And what about the deaths?
My own father drowned when I was 12 years old, because he fell into
the bathtub drunk, with all his clothes on, but the death certificate
certainly did not mention alcoholism.
It seldom does.
When I was writing "Getting Them Sober, volume 3", I detailed the 350
secondary diseases/disorders to alcoholism, but I also interviewed experts
about the various denials and misunderstandings that are prevalent.
Here is part of my interview with James Milam, author of "Under the
Influence" ---- Milam -- "Organs and systems malfunction for various
reasons. Alcoholism may be one, if not the exclusive, reason when they
do. Often, it's one of the major factors.
"Most diseases have borderline stages as well as full-blown manifestations.
Alcoholism very often is the one factor that pushes a "tendency" to
have the disease over the edge into a full-blown manifestation.
"Epilepsy is one example. Many people are borderline epileptics. Under
normal circumstances, they never manifest the disease. But during even
mild alcoholic withdrawal, a borderline patient may go over the edge.
Many patients on Dylantin in active alcoholism never need it after sobriety.
"Virtually all the other diseases have borderline degrees, except when
alcoholism pushes them over.
"I am asked, "what if I take vitamins? Can I stop or ward off the effects
of alcoholism?"
"The effects of alcoholic drinking are so powerful -- one is in such
a chronic toxic state -- it cancels benefits of proper vitamins, jogging,
and nutrition. A very watchful-of-his-diet alcoholic just slightly slows
the deterioration.
"It's not what gets into your gut that counts -- it's what gets into
your bloodstream. Your liver, etc., is constantly fighting to survive
the chronic toxic attacks. Also, the cells cannot properly process their
own waste materials, and they, therefore, are awash in their own toxins.
Nutritional supplements have a very slight effect on this.
"Early researchers studied skid-row alcoholics and found malnutrition.
They thought it was due to their poor diets. But, as private patients
became available for study, they found the same results.
"Alcoholism seriously interferes with EVERY stage of absorption, conversion,
and utilization of nutritional materials.
"So, the entire body is really toxic AND malnourished-- therefore, is
less able to ward off these diseases. The liver swells, to try to contain
the toxins, so that they don't spread to the rest of the body. The liver
is the major organ that has the job of controlling and converting toxins
to waste materials. A liver that is THAT polluted doesn't have the capacity
to do much else..... i.e., its normal work, in getting rid of toxins,
in warding off diseases."
e.) What goes on in the brain that necessitates alcoholics
needing a lifelong
program of recovery, rather than be able to "go it alone"
to recover -- as
opposed to what one can do with getting off cigarettes, where people
may need 'the patch' or hypnosis, or a short-term support group?
First of all, of course cigarettes are highly addictive. It is one of
the
shortest-acting drugs out there. Heroin's effects last about 4 hours.
The
usual hits of heroin needed by an addict are 2 to 3 hits a day. Cigarettes'
action last only a few minutes on the brain. So the cigarette addict
needs
the 20 hits or so from one cigarette, times 20 cigarettes in a pack
-- so,
400 hits to the brain a day times 365 days a year, if one smokes a pack
a
day. Makes it a very hard habit to break.
But -- nicotine does not give the same medicating effects as alcohol.
Alcohol interferes with the inhibitory process of the entire front part
of
the brain -- the forebrain. And nicotine does not.
This 'inhibitory process' of the forebrain is the part of ourselves
that
tells us to live life properly on life's terms -- tells us to give to
others,
not be selfish, obey authority, be faithful in marriage, delay
self-gratification -- to live by life's and nature's and God's rules.
So, after years of alcoholic drinking --
(1.) one needs years for forebrain and central-nervous system repair.
During
this time, the person is still "foggy" (the A.A. oldtimers
tell newcomers
that it takes 3 to 5 years to "come out of the woods"). This
also means that
in that healing process, the alcoholic needs a lot of guidance (hence
the
need for A.A. sponsors) to re-teach him/her how to not only live, but
tolerate, living life on life's terms.
(2) one still has a very patient lifelong disease that keeps telling
the
alcoholic that he/she does not have the disease ----- hence, as I said
above,
the alcoholic still needs to go to A.A. to be reminded that he/she indeed
has
alcoholism and cannot successfully return to drinking.
March, 2003, "recovery tip of the month" from Toby Rice Drews, author,
the "Getting Them Sober" books
Why do people not want to believe that alcoholism is a disease?
a.) HMO's and some other insurance companies don't
want to believe anything is a disease! Then, they have to pay for
it! But, despite this (and believe me, if there were any loophole
at all, they would find it!), they find
themselves having to go along with the American Medical Association
and admit that it is, indeed a disease.
b.) What about other people? Why do people get angry
when "it is called a disease"? Let me tell a little vignette
here. When I was on tour, training
counselors, later that evening in my hotel room, I was watching a
talk show
on tv. On stage with the host was a group of recovering alcoholics,
whose
body-language, in each of them, was very arrogant. The audience looked
very angry and got angrier each time that one of them said "he
had a disease". I wanted to say to the host at the time, "please
just ASK the audience why they feel so angry."But of course I
knew the answer-------- whenever I've counseled a family member who
didn't want to hear "it's a disease", it was because she
thought that if she said it was indeed a disease, THEN IT MEANT THAT
THE ALCOHOLIC
WAS GETTING AWAY WITH IT.
After all, she thought -- he'd say, "hey I have a disease! I'M
NOT
RESPONSIBLE, THEREFORE, FOR MY BEHAVIOR!"
What is the answer to all this?
a.) There is, of course, very valid reason for this
anger from the families!
We have seen, over the years, a lot of people who do dastardly things
to
other persons, "getting off scott-free" in the courts because
they claim they
had "bad childhoods" or have other excuses.
I personally remember listening to the cases of women who killed their
children, and thought to myself, "I hope she doesn't get off"
----- NOT
because I "wanted to punish"----- but because I had a mother
who was terribly violent since I was born, and who maybe would have
succeeded in doing all her children in ------- if she had not been
afraid of the legal consequences.
In that same vein, I hoped these violent offenders would not get away
with
it------ so that the consequences of their actions would hopefully
be a
deterrent to other people who otherwise have no inner "stop sign"
and who
would also harm/kill their children.
b.) But apart from the court system, what are the
implications of whether or not we undertand that alcoholism is a disease,
as far as treatment goes?
AND, how can we "treat" alcoholics and yet not let them
get away with awful behavior towards their families?
What people often do not know or understand is the depth of understanding
that A.A. has about abusive behavior of the alcoholic.
A.A.'s program continually says that this is a 3-part disease.......
physical, mental, and spiritual. And it emphasizes that the alcoholic
jeapordizes his/her sobriety if he or she does not treat all three
parts of
his disease.
The A.A. program does NOT say, "hey, I've got a disease.......
so get off my back. I'm not responsible."
It is just the opposite...... A.A. says that if you have this disease,
the
ONLY way to stay sober is to be responsible // make amends.
c.) What happens if the alcoholic tells you to accept
his/her rotten
behavior when they are "sober" because they "have a
disease"?
This excerpt is from the "Getting Them Sober, volume one"
book ------ "If the alcoholic threatens you by saying "you'd
better shape up and accept his
behavior just because he's not drinking anymore, then he's not sober,
he's
just dry. All he's done is remove the booze. True sobriety does not
behave
like that. Sober people are sane people. They don't threaten their
families
with abandonment just because they are not drinking. As a matter of
fact,
it is just the opposite------they are so grateful to the family for
sticking
with them that they try very hard to make amends to them for all the
grief of past years.
"Remember: if he chooses to treat only one-third of his disease
-- the
physical addiction -- instead of his whole disease-- then he is one
who will
suffer. He is the one who is playing Russian roulette with his life."
d.) Read James Milam's book, "Under the
Influence"...... it details how
scientifically, it is a provable genetic disease. (There are many
Harvard
University and other studies confirming this, over the last 40 years.)
e.) If we still do not want to believe that it is
a disease, even with all
the evidence, and therefore continue to want to think it is a problem
that
results from people who do not know how to live right -- results from
people who are immoral------ then we will not be quick to act to help
our CHILDREN who contract this disease.
Oh, yes, we'll try to get help for our kids who 'act out".........
but when
we have a child or children who get this disease genetically from
their
parent(s) or grandparent(s) or great-grandparent(s) ------- and if
that child
is a nice person and we love them dearly------- then we are going
to say that this is not happening.
We will say that the problem is due to "this or that".........
is due to all
kinds of communications problems....... all kinds of "relationship
problems"........ not due to their disease of addiction.
When I wrote "Getting Your Children Sober", I interviewed
hundreds of parents and experts on children and alcoholism.......
and so many of the interviews with parents were so very poignant,
to say the least.
Let me quote some excerpts from a chapter entitled, "three parents
tell their stories"----"I got ideas from reading books by
psychologists on communication skills. I've got a whole library on
that! I must have a hundred books, or better.
If I saw an expert or a parent on a talk show, I made certain I got
that
book. Nothing helped. My son got into stronger drugs.
"...when I saw a counselor, he thought we were dealing with a
behavior
problem. He rarely addressed the drugs. He saw the drugs as a consequence
of the behavior problem. He told me to give my son consequences.....
he told me to give consequences, NOT get an evaluation for drug treatment.
He said to "ground my son" when he stayed out all night.
Terrific. He did drugs at home, then. "When I told the counselor,
he said, "you have to take more control over your home".
I took the tv away; I took the phone away. Nothing got better. "I
spent $75 a week for 18 months. My child got arrested. The judge sent
me to the same counselor more often!
"In group sessions with the counselor, I just got blamed for
not being tough
enough with my son. The restrictions in the home weren't working "because
of me'. I looked around for other counselors.
"Then, some parents in my church heard my story and sent me to
Al-Anon, and Nar-Anon, for parents of drug addicts.
"I started attending open meetings of A.A. ("Open meetings"
are open to the public). A man came over to me after a meeting and
said to me, "If your child dies out there in the street, you
have no control over it. But if he
overdoses in your living room, you will die with him, over and over."
It hit
me like a lead balloon.
"I realized that I COULD intervene. My minister went through
all the steps
of intervention with me. We set it up with an alcoholism treatment
center
and a specialist in intervention from that center. My son has been
going to
A.A. and N.A. ever since and is clean and sober."
February, 2003, "recovery tip of the month" from Toby Rice Drews,
author, the "Getting Them Sober" books
The non-addicted spouse of an alcoholic often tries to heal her marriage
by going through religious avenues that offer help for marriages in
trouble. Why is this usually not only not-helpful, but can add to
the crazymaking in the alcoholic home?
First, let's look at the reasons why the spouse goes that route ----
a. She/he is often religious and therefore this is a natural thing
to do
b. We hope that a clergyperson will have answers that surely must
be right
c. We feel that if we take this path, we have done all we can
What can be made of all this? Will it work?
a. As Al-Anon has always said, one must take all the old ideas about
"how to help someone with a disease" and turn it on its head. Helping
an alcoholic in the way that we help a spouse with other deadly diseases,
can be just the opposite of what helps the alcoholic.
b. There are of course some clergy who do understand alcoholism and
how to REALLY help. But most do not, still. The numbers of clergy
and other helping professionals who understand the crazy dynamics
in the alcoholic household are growing, but they are still in the
small minority.
What does this professional lack of knowledge about alcoholism and
the family lead to, in counseling?
It usually leads to secular therapists who advise the spouse to "get
out"..... and it usually leads to clergy who advise the spouse to
"love the alcoholic more".... and both of them believe that if you
just "get out" or just "love them more", all will be well.
First of all, we cannot usually do either!
When the alcoholic does the next "zinger", we feel so understandably
enraged at them ---- and then we feel guilty that we are not "loving
them" as the pastoral counselor told us to do.
And when we hear from the therapist that we need to leave them --
we can't. We feel so afraid to leave ----- and we can't even express
why ---- and we feel so ashamed about how very much we feel so stuck
to them. So, then we feel guilty and ashamed that we aren't "getting
out"------ and this on top of not being able to get out!
We wind up in an emotionally no-win place, and we feel like failures.
And when we go to marriage counseling with a drinking-alcoholic spouse,
it usually winds up at a place where (on top of all this other junk)
the spouse gets blamed.
In talking with a woman who went to someone who was considered to
be the best marriage counselor in her State, she said that their counselor
wound up telling the couple that he probably wouldn't drink so much
if she smiled more! She needed an Al-Anon meeting to recover from
her family-therapy session.
Unfortunately, this is typical of marriage counseling when one of
the spouses is an alcoholic. The premise in most marriage counseling,
today, is that alcoholic drinking is NOT a result of the disease of
alcoholism, but results from problems in the marriage. And therefore,
if the marriage problems clear up, the alcoholic drinking will wither
away by itself.
And this erroneous premise is usually at work in both secular and
pastoral counseling situations.
How can you know if your therapist or pastoral counselor knows enough
to help you around this issue? Here are some ideas that may help:
a. Ask if they see alcoholism as a disease...... if not, I would run
the other way.
b. Make a copy of chapter 18, called "What are examples of crazymaking
that counselors should inherently know in order for us to trust their
advice-giving?", in the book, "Getting Them Sober, volume 4" -------
and ask the counselor to read it and see the response. It includes
the ways alcoholics blame the family, and it includes the ways we
families unconsciously blame ourselves.... and it includes the ways
that counselors often mis-read alcoholic-family signals.
c. If intervention to get the alcoholic into treatment, is one possible
goal of the counseling, I'd make sure that the counselor has an A.A.-oriented
treatment center in mind, and has a goal of the alcoholic to go to
A.A. I've come across too many pastoral counselors who send alcoholics
to A.A. to basically "dry out" for a while, and then tell them to
stop going there because "they've been saved" and therefore are "no
longer alcoholic". In the alcoholic mind, this very often leads to
drinking again.
January, 2003, "recovery tip of the month", by Toby Rice Drews, author,
the "Getting Them Sober" books
About the A.A. program and religion//spirituality:
a.) A.A. is non-exclusive....... When the early A.A.'ers
were writing the twelve steps, they were approached by persons from
a non-Christian religion who said that their religion did not have
a concept of "God", but of "Good"........ the early A.A.'s, so as
not to exlude them from this worldwide program of recovery, added
the phrase to its third step, "God as we understood him".
Many an oldtimer in A.A. wisely tells the newcomer that "the only
thing you need to know about God is that you're not it!" As it says
in the A.A. literature, "the arches are broad ----- anyone can walk
through them".
b.) The Catholic Church, the Episcopal Church, the
Lutheran Church, and many others, understand that alcoholism is a
disease...... the Catholic Church sends its alcoholic priests to the
Guest House, a treatment center for priests...... it follows the same
program as other treatment centers (education about the disease; breaking
through denial; getting patients ready to accept A.A. for life).
c.) As the 12-step programs of recovery wisely understand,
the disease is the cause of the alcoholic drinking ---- the resultant
behavior is awful, is sinful -- but the cause of the behavior is the
disease. Why is this distinction so important to remember?
(1.) Understanding the disease of alcoholism
so very much lessens the stigma -- the shame -- of having alcoholism.
It is this stigma that keeps most people away from getting help -------
even when they are truly on the verge of asking for help. (To learn
exactly how this disease works in the brain/body, read the book "Under
the Influence" by James Milam).
(2.) Understanding that this is really a disease
allows us to really see its genetic component ------ allows us to
be open to look for its symptoms in the children and grandchildren
and those we love.
When we see it as a weakness or a sin, we don't want to see it in
our "nice" children or in our "kind" parents ----- the awful ironic
result of that is that we then intervene to get the "awful-acting"
alcoholics to treatment -- but we overlook//minimize the alcoholism
in the people we love! After all, we can't "call" our 14-year-old
lovely sweet Heidi an alcoholic if it is a sin!
But if we can see the DISEASE'S symptoms in Heidi, we can intervene
and do something about it!
d.) One of the most awful things I've witnessed lately
is some (thank goodness, not most) churches' telling alcoholics that
they can go to A.A. "at the beginning" of their sobriety journey ---
but that they must stop going after a while "because they've been saved
and are no longer alcoholic." A friend of mine was married to an alcoholic
minister. He had all the good intentions in the world to stay sober.
He went to A.A. and loved it. He left A.A. after the first year of sobriety
(as he was told to do by his church) and went with other ministers to
a worldwide missionary gathering, where, in the last session, a celebratory
drinking-of-wine was held. No one got drunk, but when he came back to
the U.S., he could not stop drinking. The "just a couple of glasses
of wine" set his disease in motion again. Why is it important to keep
going to A.A. even after a year or two or more of sobriety? Not only
to keep "giving it away to keep it" ----- but also because of the nature
of the disease of alcoholism. If an alcoholic does not continually hear
other alcoholics remind him/her (in meetings) that they still have the
disease, the disease itself will "tell" the alcoholic that he no longer
has it......... and can therefore drink again.